state budget

The Joint Budget Committee Wednesday, acting as the conference committee on the 2023-24 state budget bill, came up with its recommendations on what to keep and what to pitch.

Among the committee's decisions: A $10 million general fund boost to the Division of Insurance for the state's reinsurance program, a Jan. 3 request from the governor that was never acted on by the JBC until Wednesday.

In its work two weeks ago, the state Senate offered 37 amendments to Senate Bill 214, adopting 17. That increased the $38.5 billion budget bill by $84.9 million, almost all of it in general fund dollars. Those are normally the discretionary dollars lawmakers have to add or expand programs in state government.

By law, the General Assembly has to send the governor a balanced budget, so the additions at least temporarily put the budget out of balance.

When SB 214 got to the House, the House Appropriations Committee stripped off all the Senate amendments and sent a "clean" bill to the House floor. 

The House put back 13 out of the 17 amendments from the Senate and added 12 of their own. That increased the spending in SB 214 by $111 million, of which $108 million was general fund dollars.

Then it was back to the JBC, which is charged with resolving the differences. The conference committee was given permission to go beyond the scope of differences between the House and Senate versions of the Long Appropriations Bill.

As a conference committee, the JBC would be charged with responding to the wishes of their chambers and caucuses,

Several amendments were removed because they could create "substantive law" through the budget bill, which isn't allowed. That included a $30.6 million payment to the Public Employees Retirement Association, which came through a Senate amendment, that would have covered interest payments tied to a missed 2020 payment to PERA by the state. The payment was made last year, but several lawmakers, including Rep. Shannon Bird, D-Westminster, advocated for that payment through legislation that year. 

Bird is now vice-chair of the JBC, and Wednesday she made the call to get rid of the Senate amendment because of the substantive law issue. But she pointed out there is also legislation coming that could make up that interest payment. 

Another amendment that both chambers agreed to was to cover an interest payment to providers of durable medical equipment, tied to a delay in provider rate increases. That amendment also violated the substantive law provision.

They also dumped the $356,701 that would go to the Yuma school district to help pay for the costs of removing their Indian mascot from athletic uniforms, gym floors and other signage. The House adopted the same amount but indicated the money would be split among all the schools that had to make those changes.

But the money is likely headed their way anyway.

"We don't have the authority to do this," said Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer, R-Brighton, who had been the deciding vote in the Senate on the amendment. She indicated an agreement had been made that the money would be appropriated to the school district through the School Finance Act.

The conference committee began with the final version of the Senate, meaning the amendments adopted by the Senate would be retained unless otherwise rejected by the conference committee.

The largest changes to the budget dealt with funding for crime victims, both in the Department of Public Safety ($30 million) and the Department of Public Health and Environment ($5 million). While the conference committee kept the amendments, they reduced the amounts to $8 million for the public safety fund and $4 million for the CDPHE fund. 

The conference committee also restored all the amendments that were part of the deal made by the two caucuses during the House's deliberations on the Long Bill, although most the appropriations were reduced. That included an appropriation to a criminal justice diversion program within the Behavioral Health Administration, which was reduced from $5 million to $2 million. An appropriation to cover courthouse repairs, initially approved in the House at $850,000, was reduced to $425,000. 

An $11,727 appropriation to the state Civil Air Patrol, an amendment adopted in both chambers but which was part of the Republican House ask, also stayed in the budget. The reduced appropriations to the crime victim programs also were part of the deal, as was money for a wildlife safe passages fund — although the appropriation was also reduced. 

An appropriation of $5 million to Denver Health, which is struggling financially, was reduced to $1 million. Denver Health earlier this year was given $5 million through the mid-year budget adjustment process.

The conference committee also made a few changes that weren't part of the amendments offered by the House or Senate.

The largest was the $10 million boost to the Division of Insurance for the state's reinsurance program, an amendment not included in the debates over the budget. Bird, who made the motion for the funding, gave no explanation on why the reinsurance program needed an additional $10 million.

Commissioner of Insurance Michael Conway, however, had the answer: The governor asked for the $10 million as part of his Jan. 3 supplemental request for the 2023-24 budget. The request states the money would go toward reducing health insurance premiums, in further support of the reinsurance program, which is a part of the Health Insurance Affordability Enterprise.

The conference committee report now heads first to the House for their review of the changes, expected on Thursday.